| Rural Industries Research & Development Corporation |
RIRDC ANNUAL OPERATIONAL PLAN
2001-2002
![]()
RIRDC—Revenue from Other
Sources 2001-2002 (Total Revenue ($’000))*
| Out–comes |
|
|||
| Monies from industry levies | Indirect Commonwealth Appropriation and Matching Commonwealth levy contribution | Monies from other sources | Total Revenue from independent sources | |
| Out–come | 4,362 | 15,139 | 5,141 | 24,642 |
Relationships Between Outcomes and Outputs
The map below shows the relationship between outcomes and the contributing outputs for RIRDC during 2001–2002.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Note: The figures above do not
include the operations of the Dried Fruits R&D Council.
| Performance information for RIRDC Outcome - Effectiveness | |
| Economic returns from RIRDC investments in excess of prescribed benefit/cost ratios, as well as non-monetary and public good benefits for the community from strategic and environmental research. Review of R&D programs on a 4 year rolling evaluation basis. | Ability to achieve benefit/cost ratios and internal
rates of return on R&D projects as follows:
Output 1 – B/C of 2 and IRR of 15% Output 2 – B/C of 5 and IRR of 20% Output 3 - B/C of 10 and IRR of 25% Output 4 – B/C of 10 and IRR of 25% |
| Alignment of RIRDC’s priorities and plans with those of industry and the Commonwealth Government | Demonstrated compliance with Government R&D priorities as outlined in Minister’s letter of 14 December 1999 and letter of 11 May 2001 from the Parliamentary Secretary. Demonstrated consultation with industry prior to finalisation of industry R&D plans. |
| Ratio of administration costs to total costs | Ratio of administration costs to total costs less than the RDC average |
| Expansion of the gross value of production of new and emerging industries supported by RIRDC | Subject to externalities, RIRDC’s ability to contribute to industry growth demonstrated by increasing size of industry |
| Translation of research outputs into industry benefits | Rates of adoption of research outputs as evidenced by RIRDC’s user surveys and adoption estimates derived as part of benefit/cost analysis of RIRDC investments |
| Performance Information for RIRDC Outputs | |
| Output 1 - Management of R&D that investigates and develops prospects for new industries in rural and regional Australia | Quality: Research contracts let by end
July and 90% of all milestones processed within 3 weeks of receipt
Quantity: 21 new and 64 continuing contracts under management. Price: Average of $26,490 per contract |
| Output 2 - Management of R&D that expedites the growth and development of emerging rural and associated processing industries | Quality: Research contracts let by end
July and 90% of all milestones processed within 3 weeks of receipt
Quantity: 39 new and 91 continuing contracts under management Price: Average of $29,559 per contract |
| Output 3 - Management of R&D that maximises the contribution of R&D to the profitability and sustainability of the established rural industries that RIRDC represents | Quality: Research contracts let by end
July and 90% of all milestones processed within 3 weeks of receipt
Quantity: 52 new and 118 continuing contracts under management Price: Average of $45,240 per contract |
| Output 4 - Management of R&D that identifies key generic cross sectoral issues confronting the rural sector and the formulation of appropriate programs that will benefit the rural sector and Australia. | Quality: Research contracts let by end
July and 90% of all milestones processed within 3 weeks of receipt
Quantity: 35 new and 73 continuing contracts under management Price: Average of $27,855 per contract |
Source:Portfolio Budget Statement 2001-02,
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Portfolio,
Budget Related Paper No. 1.1, Page 231.
Our Program Structure for 2001-2002
![]()
|
Last updated: 4 June 2001 Copyright
© RIRDC
http://www.rirdc.gov.au/aop01/portfoliobudget.html