Rural Industries
|
|| Home || Search || Contact || Publications Eshop ||
RIRDC Completed Projects in 1999-2000 & Research in Progress as at June 2000
PRODUCTION - Bee husbandry and management
Development of a specific aggregation
lure for Apis cerana javana (CSE-81A)
PRODUCTION - Nutrition
Crude protein and amino acid levels
of pollens collected by honeybees in southern NSW (DAN-134A)
RESOURCES
Floral resource database for the
NSW apiary industry (DAN-155A)
A comprehensive study of beekeepers' use of honey and pollen flora resource in Victoria (DAV-109A)
POLLINATION
Developing a communications and marketing
strategy for honeybee crop pollination (DAV-119A)
Non-fungicidal and biological control of core rots in pome fruit (TAR-1A)
On 1 July 1995, the former Honeybee Research and Development Council became a committee of the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.
This publication, Honeybee Research Report 2000, provides details of honeybee research from July 1999 until June 2000 and lists projects commencing in the 2000/2001 financial year. It follows the Honeybee Research and Development Council Research Report 1980-1995 and the RIRDC Reports 1995-1997, 1998 and 1999, which were a collection of final report and progress summaries of levy funded honeybee research until June 1999.
This report provides information to help apiarists and others access research recommendations and research in progress, together with researcher contact details, in a simple, easy to read format.
This report, a new addition to RIRDCs diverse range of almost 400 research publications, forms part of our Honeybee R&D program, which aims to improve the productivity and profitability of the Australian beekeeping industry.
Most of our publications are available for viewing, downloading or purchasing online through our website at www.rirdc.gov.au/pub/cat/contents.html. Alternatively, there is a RIRDC order form included on the last page of this publication.
Peter Core
Managing Director
Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation
| Project Title | Crude protein, amino acid and fat levels of pollens collected by honeybees primarily in southern NSW. |
| RIRDC Project No: | DAN 134A |
| Researcher: | Doug Somerville |
| Organisation: | NSW Agriculture
PO Box 389 Goulburn NSW 2580 |
| Phone: | (02) 4828 6619 |
| Fax: | (02) 4822 3261 |
| Email: | doug.somerville@agric.nsw.gov.au |
| Objective | To trap and analyse pollens from a range of floral species to determine their nutritional values for amino acids, crude protein and fat levels, as this relates to honeybee dietary requirements. In the process of the study, investigate the possible variation of qualities of pollen originating from the same species with a major focus on Paterson’s curse (Echium plantagineum) pollen. |
| Background | Honeybees require a range of elements
to satisfy their nutritional requirements including proteins, carbohydrates,
minerals, fats (lipids), vitamins and water for normal growth and development.
Pollen normally satisfies the dietary requirements for proteins, minerals,
lipids and vitamins. The proteins are composed of a series of amino acids,
10 of which have been identified as being essential for honeybee nutritional
requirements.
Ample protein promotes a high birth rate and long-lived bees, whereas protein deficient conditions minimise the birth levels and length of life of adult bees. The quality of pollen is paramount to the success of a beekeeper. This research set out to determine the more valuable pollen sources to honeybees with a particular interest in southern NSW. |
| Research | Many hundreds of pollen samples
were gathered during the course of the research but, for a range of reasons,
only 194 samples were analysed. Samples were tested for nitrogen (crude
protein), 17 amino acids and fat percent.
This information was then used to report on the suitability of 61 species of plants, as to the quality of the pollen produced, as it relates to honeybee nutritional requirements. |
| Outcomes | It is apparent from this research
that pollen qualities vary within the one species. Each species may fall
within one or two groupings, ie, a pollen, when judged by its quality,
may be either poor, average, above average, or of excellent quality.
What beekeepers have traditionally observed is that bees may do well on one source of pollen but not on another, also the same source of pollen may not produce the same results increasing populations and brood area each time it becomes available. What is possibly happening is a lack of knowledge on the adult body, crude protein levels, before going onto a new pollen source. Bees with high body, crude protein levels, will remain in reasonable condition and recover quickly if placed on an average pollen source. Whereas bees with very low body crude protein levels, (eg, coming off sunflowers) will run down very quickly if placed on a medium to heavy honey flow with average quality pollen support. Recovery of a colony after these circumstances could be as much as four months, to obtain a populous hive ready to work another honey flow. Armed with the knowledge that different pollen species contain different levels of nutrients, it should be possible for beekeepers to better manage their bees, paying more attention to the ongoing nutrition status of the colony. |
| Implications | Improved productivity, longer lived queens and workers, drones with high fertility and lower potential disease risks are all possible implications from beekeepers incorporating the knowledge of this research into their management strategies. |
| Publications | Somerville, DC (2000). "Crude
protein, amino acid and fat levels of pollens collected by honeybees primarily
in southern NSW". Final Report: DAN-134A for the Rural Industries Research
& Development Corporation. NSW Agriculture, Goulburn, NSW.
Somerville, DC; Peasley, W (1996). "Eucalyptus pollens and their value to honeybee nutrition". Proceedings: 3rd Asian Apicultural Association Conference, Hanoi, Vietnam (In Press). 6–10th October 1996. Somerville, DC (1997). "Value of pollens collected from agricultural crops". Proceedings: Crop Pollination Association Inc., 5th Annual Conference, Tatura, and Victoria. 14–15 October 1999. |
| Project Title | Floral resource database for the NSW apiary industry |
| RIRDC Project No: | DAN 155A |
| Researcher: | Doug Somerville |
| Organisation: | NSW Agriculture
PO Box 389 Goulburn NSW 2580 |
| Phone: | (02) 4828 6619 |
| Fax: | (02) 4822 3261 |
| Email: | doug.somerville@agric.nsw.gov.au |
| Objective | To create a database of floral resource information for the NSW apiary industry. |
| Background | Floral resources are the basis
of the Australian beekeeping industry but there is increasing pressure
on the beekeeping industry from:
· reduced physical resources due to forestry, land clearing, urban expansion, firewoodA Honeybee Research and Development Council national workshop, held in Canberra in 1989 advocated documentation of the floral resources on which the beekeeping industry is dependent in each state. |
| Research | Beekeepers with 200 or more hives
registered with NSW Agriculture were surveyed for the purpose of collecting
information on floral species of major importance to the beekeeping industry,
including data on honey and pollen values, land tenure, location of sites,
frequency of flowering and flowering period. Information was also collected
on number of hives, nucleus colonies, yield per hive, total number of bee
sites on various land tenures, persons employed and gross income distribution.
Three mailings were conducted, these were also supported by interviews of some non-respondents. A total response of 81% was achieved. The total number of hives for all beekeepers surveyed was approximately 200,000 hives. Average honey yields per hive per year was 89.4 kg. There were 23,479 bee sites: 5,365 State Forests; 412 National Parks & Wildlife Service; 749 Crown Lands; 2,972 Rural Lands Protection Board and 13,981 for private properties. |
| Outcomes | The results obtained give a clear picture of the significant floral resources of NSW as they relate to the beekeeping industry. This information will be used to illustrate the floral species of major importance on each land tenure and the characteristics of those floral resources as far as beekeeping activities are concerned. |
| Implications | The report will be readily used
by new and existing beekeepers to assist them in their decision-making
processes and help minimise poor decision making and costly management
strategies. The information collected can also be utilised by various land
managers and land use planners to take beekeeping requirements into consideration.
The information will also be of considerable benefit to those in the scientific community studying nectarivores and/or the general flowering characteristics of a range of floral species in the NSW landscape. |
| Publications | Floral resource database for the NSW apiary industry by Doug Somerville, RIRDC Publication No. 99/174 |
| Project Title | A comprehensive study of beekeepers’ use of honey and pollen flora resources in Victoria |
| RIRDC Project No: | DAV 109A |
| Researcher: | Mr Russell Goodman |
| Organisation: | Institute for Horticultural
Development
Agriculture Victoria Department of Natural Resources and Environment |
| Phone: | 03 9210 9222 |
| Fax: | 03 9800 3521 |
| Email: | russell.goodman@nre.vic.gov.au |
| Objectives |
· To identify apiary sites on public land in Victoria |
| Background | The viability of the apiary industry
depends on apiarists’ continued access to nectar and pollen yielding flora.
Apiarists may move their hives up to seven times per year to take advantage
of flowering plants. While not owning the sites and not using them all
each year, commercial apiarists hold a high number of sites as insurance
against the spasmodic flowering of many Eucalypt species.
The apiary industry is heavily dependant on public land because it contains the majority of remaining native forest on which the industry is so reliant. In Victoria, beekeeping is permitted in designated public land apiary sites located in State forests, parks and reserves including selected National Parks, and other public land provided the appropriate licence or permit fee is paid. In 1989, the Honeybee Research and Development Committee convened a national workshop to discuss the effects of honeybees on the Australian environment and the industry’s continued access to the nectar and pollen resource. One major recommendation of the workshop was that each State should conduct a survey to determine industry’s use and value of apiary sites. |
| Research | Survey questionnaires seeking
information on public land and private apiary site
usage were designed, trialed in cooperation with the Victorian Apiarists’ Association Inc. and then amended before a full mail-out to all Victorian apiarists owning 50 or more beehives registered with the Department of Natural Resources and Environment. A total of 170 (40.5%) of 420 apiarists mailed survey
forms responded to the
Information supplied by respondents was entered in a Microsoft
Access computer
|
| Outcomes | The results of the survey:
· provide comprehensive information on species of nectar and pollen producing flora targeted by apiarists throughout Victoria.Respondents were unable to identify areas of the State for possible expansion of the apiary industry in Victoria. |
| Implications | This report will ensure that the
Victorian apiary industry will have access to detailed information that
demonstrates the value and importance of native nectar and pollen flora
for the economic survival of apiary enterprises. The completed survey provides,
for the first time, detailed information that the industry may use in submissions
to agencies involved in determining the future availability of particular
apiary sites.
The information contained in the report will also be useful to public land managers and government agencies when determining the use of public land for apiculture. |
| Publications | Final Report for Project DAV-109A: "A study of beekeepers’ use of honey and pollen resources in Victoria." |
| Project Title | Developing a communication and marketing strategy for honeybee crop pollination services |
| RIRDC Project No: | DAV 119A |
| Researcher: | Russell Goodman |
| Organisation: | Institute for Horticultural
Development
Agriculture Victoria Department of Natural Resources and Environment |
| Phone: | 03 9210 9222 |
| Fax: | 03 9800 3521 |
| Email: | russell.goodman@nre.vic.gov.au |
| Objectives |
· To improve and promote an effective honeybee crop pollination service by developing a national marketing and communications strategy. |
| Background | Honeybees (Apis mellifera)
are important pollinators of many fruit and seed crops and can be introduced
to flowering crops in large numbers to provide optimum fruit or seed set
and improved crop production. Many apiarists provide a honeybee crop pollination
service to growers on a fee for service basis.
A survey of the delivery and use of honeybee crop pollination services in Victoria in 1995 found that: · Generally, growers did not understand honeybees, their activities and aspects of honeybee pollination.This project was designed to address these issues by developing suitable written and illustrated material for apiarists and growers. |
| Research | A literature search was conducted
to glean information about the pollination of a range of crops.
Brochures were developed in co-operation with grower and
apiarist organisations. The latter involved the Crop Pollination Association
(Southeastern Australia) and the Pollination Association of Western Australia.
Individual providers of honeybee crop pollination services were also extensively
consulted.
|
| Project Title | Non-fungicidal and biological control of core rots in pome fruit | |
| RIRDC Project No: | TAR-1A | |
| Researcher: | Mr Chris Archer | |
| Organisation: | University of Tasmania – Tasmanian Institute of Agricultural Research | |
| Phone: | (03) 6233 6830 | |
| Fax: | (03) 6228 5123 | |
| Email: | Chris.Archer@dpiwe.tas.gov.au | |
| Objectives |
· Development of a low cost and efficacious method of management of the core rot disease in susceptible pome fruit varieties. |
|
| Background | Core rots (also known as mouldy core) of apples is a major problem for Australian apple growers and exporters. The disease is caused by a complex of fungal pathogens (Alternaria and Pezicula spp. predominate), and results in a zone of rotting tissue around the apple core. The disease develops from infections that occur during flowering but remains latent until after harvest when the apples are held in controlled atmosphere storage. Because of the discrete period (full bloom) and site (senescing apple blossom) at which infection occurs, there is a strong potential for control of the disease by way of competitive or antagonistic biological control agents. | |
| Research | Laboratory investigations undertaken
as a component of this project have revealed a fungal species that occurs
in apple cores but does not cause rots. This fungus (Gliocladium roseum)
has been found capable of reducing the incidence of core rots due to Alternaria
infections in disease susceptible varieties. A further outcome of this
project has been the determination of an inexpensive method for
large scale bulking of the Gliocladium material.
Investigations are being undertaken to determine methods of integrating this organism, as a biological control agent, into conventional orchard management practices used for the control of other diseases (such as powdery mildew). Core rot is promoted in those apple varieties that possess an open sinus, that is, a continuous passage from the calyx into the core region. Within this project an investigation of new apple varieties demonstrated that three varieties (Johnagold, Royal Gala, Sundowner) have the morphology to promote core rot development with two (Johnagold and Sundowner), exhibiting similar levels of rot occurrence to Red Fuji (considered a susceptible variety). A common difficulty with biological control programs is the method by which a bio-control agent is delivered to the appropriate site on a plant. For the core rot pathogens the site of infection is the apple blossom. When using inundative sprayers there is a significant quantity of material that misses the blossom and is effectively wasted. What is required, is a method of accurately placing the control agent in an adequate concentration solely on the flowers. As beehives are normally placed in apple orchards during the full bloom period for the purposes of pollination there is an opportunity to use honeybees as a transfer vector for biological control material to the apple blossom. Trials conducted in the 1998 season demonstrated bees to be more efficient in the transfer of material to the flowers than high volume inundative spraying. Material transferred by bees, resulted in a similar concentration of biocontrol material at the flowers compared with spraying, however the sprayed material declined rapidly in concentration over time as compared with that transferred by bees. There appear to be no adverse effects on the honeybees from the biological control agent. |
|
| Outcomes |
· Determination of a fungal species (Gliocladium roseum) capable of reducing the incidence of Alternaria type core rots. |
|
| Implications | The use of a biological control for Alternaria type core rots in pome fruit provides the opportunity to reduce fungicide applications for disease control. This bio-control fungus needs to be successfully integrated into the conventional orchard management practices of an orchard. | |
| Publications | None to date | |
