Rural Industries
|
|| Home || Search || Contact || Publications Eshop || Privacy Statement ||
RIRDC Completed Projects in 1999-2000 & Research in Progress as at June 2000
To Research in Progress
2.7 TEA TREE OIL
COMPLETED PROJECTS 1999-2000
PROJECT No PROJECT TITLE RESEARCHER PHONE ORGANISATION CSF-55A Development of DNA markers for tea tree Dr John Doran 02 6281 8319 CSIRO Forestry & Forest Products DAQ-252A Plant Nutritional Survey of the Australian Tea Tree Industry Dr James Drinnan 07 4092 8555 Qld Department of Primary Industries UWA-51A Skin sensitivity testing for tea tree oil - second stage A/Professor Tom Riley 08 9346 3690 University of Western Australia
|
COMPLETED PROJECTS prior to 1999-2000 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| UWA-42A | Skin Sensitivity Testing for Tea Tree Oil | Dr J E Greig, Ms C F Carson, Dr M S Stuckey, A/Professor T V Riley | 08 9346 3690 | Department of Microbiology, The University of Western Australia | |
| UWA-24A | The antimicrobial activity of tea tree oil | A/Professor T V Riley | 08 9346 3690 | University of Western Australia | |
| DAN-74A | Herbicides for weed control in tea tree oil plantations | Tony Cook | 02 6763 1100 | NSW Agriculture | |
| DAN-91A | Insect pest management in tea tree | Gus Campbell | 02 66280604 | NSW Agriculture | |
| US-20A | Towards non-chemical control of weeds in tea tree | J Murtagh, G Baker & J Doran | 02 9692 2050 | University of Sydney | |
| DAN-87A | Breeding and selection of Australian tea tree for improved oil yield and quality | Dr I Southwell | 02 6626 1104 | NSW Agriculture | |
| DAN-104A | Significance of cineole for the bioactivity and irritancy of tea tree oil | Dr I Southwell | 02 6626 1224 | NSW Agriculture | |
| DAQ-184A | Developing the North Queensland tea tree industry | Dr J Drinnan | 07 4092 8555 | Queensland Department of Primary Industries | |
|
Please note, researchers contact details were correct when submitted but may not still be current
| Outcomes | The volunteers ranged in age from
18 to 82 years, with an average age of 40. Women made up 61% of the group,
and 63% of volunteers were sure of having previously used tea tree oil.
The tests for immediate allergy indicated that while we had an overly reactive group of people, only 1.4% of people (3 of 219) displayed any reaction to tea tree oil, and reactions were to only 1 or 2 of 10 oils. The volunteers also appeared to be slightly more reactive to contact allergens than might be expected. A total of 52 of the 219 volunteers displayed some reaction to tea tree oil although, in a number of these people, this consisted only of a questionable reaction to 1 or 2 of the 10 oils. Secondary testing was performed on 33 volunteers. Results were classified as allergic contact dermatitis, mild or marked irritant contact dermatitis, indistinguishable between allergy and irritancy, or no response. The prevalence of allergy in the whole group was 2.9% up to a possible 4.8% if indistinguishable is included. To have an allergy requires a previous exposure to the substance being tested, and the levels of allergy amongst those who had previously used tea tree oil was 4.6% up to a possible 7.6% including the indistinguishable reactions. The prevalence of marked irritancy to 100% tea tree oil ranged from 2.4-4.3% (with or without the indistinguishable reactions), with any level of irritancy ranging from 7.2-10.1%. Irritant reactions are particularly concentration dependent, which means that many of these reactions should be avoidable if a lower concentration of oil is used. Very few reactions occurred in response to tea tree oil components, with a single mild response to each of 2 components, and 4 significant reactions to another component. |
| Implications | While the prevalence of irritant or allergic reactions to tea tree oil is low, it is clear that a small proportion of people may experience adverse effects, especially if 100% oil is used. This information will allow appropriate marketing of the product for safe usage. |
| Implications | A minimum of $1,100 per hectare
can be returned to growers in weedy situations by adopting the results
of this project. Apart from these financial gains, new recommendations
will allow for increased managerial choices, superior weed control and
less likelihood of developing herbicide resistance.
Growers will possess better weed identification skills as a result of the advisory booklet and will be best advised to solve a particular weed problem. Although considerable cost savings were made with new treatments (blanket applied), there are further savings and benefits if the practice of directed spraying was properly developed. This could allow the use of herbicides normally damaging to tea trees. |
| Outcomes | The results of these studies showed
that weeds reduced tea tree leaf yields by an average 27% (range 9 to 47),
but without affecting oil concentration or quality. This loss in yield
is associated with competition for light, water and nutrients (especially
nitrogen).
Two features of the regrowth cycle of tea tree are thought to be relevant to the crop’s competitiveness after harvest: the first, "coppice vigour" (the high relative growth rate of new shoots from the cut stump) increases the crop’s ability to compete for light; while the second, death of fine roots about halfway through the regrowth cycle, reduces the crop’s ability to compete for water and nutrients in the latter half of the regrowth cycle. When all weed control strategies were compared, herbicides continued to provide the most effective control, while mechanical cultivation was the best of the non-chemical methods. Other strategies used by the industry may also be effective, but they need to be assessed against these two standards. |
| Implications | While the use of herbicides still provides the most effective method of weed control, non-chemical methods can also be used but, irrespective of the method selected, it is imperative that it be implemented in the latter half of the regrowth cycle when competition from weeds is greatest. |
![]()
![]() ![]()
|
Last updated: 2 August 2000
Copyright © RIRDC
http://www.rirdc.gov.au/comp00/tto1.htm