| Background |
The
dependence on herbicides for arrowhead control has led to the problem of
herbicide resistance. Almost all rice is aerially sown, limiting the chemical
options for controlling arrowhead populations, and increasing the risk
of herbicide resistance.
In environmental terms it
is undesirable for farmers to be introducing into the environment herbicides
that do not work, or have impaired efficiency. In addition it is important
to preserve the life of safe and effective chemicals for as long as possible,
through seeking other options which can be used in an integrated weed management
(IWM) approach.
This project, therefore,
will provide the opportunity to gather the requisite knowledge to enable
IWM strategies to be developed |
| Research |
Research
was conducted into the biology of arrowhead under the following headings:
- the distribution of arrowhead
- herbicide resistance in
arrowhead
- seed production and dispersal
- germination requirements
of arrowhead
- management factors and
arrowhead |
| Outcomes |
Distribution
studies confirmed that arrowhead is the fourth most widespread weed in
rice in NSW, occurring in all of the rice growing regions, but at higher
levels in the MIA and CIA, where continuous rice growing has led to a buildup
in the soil seed bank.
Herbicide resistance studies
confirmed that there are many populations of arrowhead in rice in NSW that
are resistant to Londax® (bensulfuron), whilst no resistance
was detected to MCPA or Taipan® (benzofenap). Resistance
to Londax occurred in a greater proportion of samples from the CIA than
the MIA. Studies of the phasic development of arrowhead indicate that it
develops quickly after germination and can set seed very early in the rice
growing season and continue to do so throughout the season.
Seed production studies indicated
that arrowhead is a prolific producer of seeds, able to produce many thousands
of seed per plant. These seeds than have the ability to float for some
time after being shed, allowing dispersal. The seeds are highly viable
as soon as they are shed from the plant and remain viable in the soil for
at least three years and possibly longer. Harvesting equipment does not
tend to take in arrowhead seed, but it can still be transported stuck to
the vehicle. These seed need favourable conditions in which to germinate.
Studies here have shown that arrowhead seeds require light to germinate,
making those on the soil surface the most likely to do so. Germination
is high below 10ºC, at around 25%, and above around 11.5ºC germination
rises to almost 80% of seeds. Unlike starfruit (see PhD study by Richard
Graham), arrowhead does not require ethylene (a hormone produced when dry
soil becomes rapidly inundated) to germinate, however its germination is
greatly enhanced by the presence of free standing water.
Trials here showed that arrowhead
can reduce the yield of rice by up to 75% if completely unchecked. It is
therefore important to manage arrowhead well, particularly in light of
the resistance to Londax. Studies into the management of stubble to help
control arrowhead proved unsuccessful, indicating that arrowhead is not
affected by these strategies.
Both early and late additions
of nitrogen improved the performance of arrowhead, with more nitrogen producing
better arrowhead growth. Draining of rice bays before rice sowing, when
arrowhead seedlings were very young, proved a useful technique. In this
case, a flush of water was added, to promote arrowhead germination. This
was followed by specific periods of water removal, during which very young
arrowhead plants died. One week removal was enough to kill very young plants.
A delay in the water removal until the arrowhead plants were more mature
proved unsuccessful. |
| Implications |
This
project has confirmed the extent of the arrowhead problem in NSW rice,
and the extent of the herbicide resistance problem. It also confirms that
some of the current management practices may be contributing to the arrowhead
problem.
It also has shown that there
are a number of aspects of the biology of arrowhead that are important
in its spread as a weed. The response of arrowhead to light, temperature
and inundation indicate that conditions are highly suitable for its growth
at the beginning of the rice season.
This can be used in two ways.
The information from the draining experiment, summarised in the outcomes
section, above, could be used to develop a draining programme that would
disadvantage arrowhead. As an offshoot of such a programme, the response
of arrowhead to a flush of water could be utilised, by encouraging arrowhead
to grow with a flush of water, before killing it with a dose of knockdown
herbicide.
The results from this project
improve our knowledge of arrowhead, on of the most problematic weeds in
the rice growing system. This knowledge can now be used to develop an integrated
weed management (IWM) programme for arrowhead. |