| Rural Industries Research & Development Corporation |
![]()
A lot has been written about the benefits of planting trees on farms as part of a property management plan and a regional forest industry development strategy.
Where landholders plan to make commercial returns from farm forestry, it is important to have a strong understanding of the markets for their forestry products. Just like meat, fibre and grain products, forest products require processing before markets will buy them.
Forest processing industries have developed around existing natural forests or large plantation forests and there are limited market openings for small forest growers in Australia. One strategy is for forest growers to process timber on-site at the time of harvesting.
The National Commercial Agroforestry Strategy identified that limited
information about the viability and management of on-site processing was
a barrier to widespread adoption of farm forestry. So the Joint Venture
Agroforestry Research and Development Program (JVAP) commissioned research
to investigate utilisation practices for the farm forester. The research
was managed by RIRDC.
JVAP research into utilisation practices for the farm forester found that the on-site processing system with the greatest potential is portable sawmilling. This is because the returns for sawn timber can be high, and the costs associated with operating a portable sawmill can be relatively low.
Twenty-five portable sawmill operators in Victoria, and 14 portable sawmill manufacturers, were interviewed during implementation of the JVAP research project. This provided an understanding of issues involved with owning and operating a portable sawmill so that the true costs of on-site sawn timber production and its potential returns could be assessed. The JVAP research compared the level of automation, the productivity, and prices of portable sawmill systems.
Information gathered from the JVAP research was used to construct scenarios that indicate conditions which have to be met for a viable portable sawmilling enterprise.
Portable Sawmilling
Portable sawmilling is taken to include production of green, air-dry
and kiln-dry sawn timber using sawmilling equipment which is taken to the
farm forestry site, operated there, and then dismantled. The JVAP research
found that nearly half the portable sawmill operations in Victoria are
contract sawmillers on farm foresters.
There are numerous portable sawmills on the Australian market, ranging from simple lightweight frames to which a chainsaw can be attached, to complex horizontal band saw mills, single circular saw units and twin circular saw units.
There are also benchsaws consisting of a stationary headrig and a carriage onto which sawlogs are placed and subsequently moved through the saw. In general, the JVAP research found that the most productive sawmills possess the highest level of automation, and these are relatively expensive.
Portable sawmills have the potential to contribute to both industrial-scale and farm forestry. At an industrial scale, portable sawmills have the potential to use timber resulting from salvage operations following natural disasters and commercial harvesting operations in existing forests.
At a farm forestry scale, portable sawmills have the potential to deal effectively with small-scale and relatively isolated plantings which have not attracted industrial-scale timber processors.
Advantages of portable sawmilling are widely documented and include:
Nevertheless, portable sawmills have a number of disadvantages,
including relatively low productivity, high labour intensity, and a requirement
for heavy lifting at or close to ground level. In addition, the working
environment may not conform with best industry practise for occupational
health and safety.
The dimensional accuracy and product finish of timber sawn with portable sawmills may not be of as high quality as timber from industrial-scale mills. Similarly, portable sawmills are unlikely to be able to handle small diameter sawlogs from rapidly grown eucalypts with their associated high internal growth stresses.
The full report of the JVAP Research presents detailed findings from a survey of portable sawmills. The survey found that:
The JVAP research compared the level of automation per $1000 of
sawmill purchase prices for different portable sawmills. This suggested
that the lower priced sawmills such as single circular saws offer more
value for money than more expensive sawmills such as some double circular
saws.
Table 1 summarises the main advantages of particular types of portable
sawmills.
Table 1: Main advantages
of Differenet Portable Sawnmills
|
|
|
| Chainsaw
mills
Horizontal bandsaw
mills
Single circular sawmills
Twin circular
sawmills
Bench-type units |
|
Many potential costs are not considered before a portable sawmill
is purchased - for example the time required for producing and marketing
sawn timber, safety and log handling equipment, sawlog supply costs, and
storage and handling costs for sawn timber. Figure 1 shows the typical
distribution of costs for a softwood sawmill.
Figure 1: typical costs distribution for softwood sawmill

The cost of sawlogs used by a sawmill is usually the highest single cost of sawn timber production - often amounting to 60 percent of total costs. Softwood stumpage, harvest and transport typically costs around $50/m3. Hardwood stumpage, harvest and transport typically costs between $30 and $100/m3 depending on species and quality.
To ensure high returns from quality timber, sawlogs should be processed as soon as possible after felling, especially during warm weather.
The actual time spent sawing is a small proportion of the total time spent producing sawn timber. Therefore, the layout of the site for portable sawmilling should ensure that log supply, loading, and timber handling are as rapid as possible. Log loading is required only for portable mils with a bed or carriage. When using other types of mills, log positioning is the most important issue.
The JVAP research analysed the costs and break-even values for different portable sawmilling options. The details are available in the full report. Figure 2 shows the break-even volumes for individual portable sawmills surveyed.
Figure 2 shows that portable sawmilling is financially feasible if certain
conditions are met, not least of which are the availability os sufficient
volumes of sawlogs and competitive prices for sawn timber. The smaller
break-even volume for hardwood enterprises in all cases highlights the
benefits of targeting high value species.
However, the technical limitations of milling certain species, such as high internal growth stresses in small eucalypt logs, may make infeasible the processing of sufficient quantities of high value sawn timber. Note that the break-even analysis summarised in Figure 2 does not allow for labour costs - on the assumption that owner operators are making the comparison.
The relatively low productivity of portable sawmills means that the
production of industrial wood products may be difficult to achieve competitively.
Both milling for high throughput and milling for high recovery highlight
the labour intensiveness of portable sawmilling enterprises. There is a
tradeoff between productivity and capital outlay requirements in portable
sawmilling. The targeting of high value species and products is the most
viable proposition for portable sawmilling operators.
The loading and handling of sawlogs and sawn timber can result in injury because heavy lifting is often required. Circular saw mills which move across a log set in position on the ground reduce the risk of lifting injuries.
The noise levels around portable sawmills are high and so sawmill operators
should use hearing protection.
Sawdust moved around by wind and draughts can create respiratory and
eye problems in operators, as can exhaust fumes. Mills with cable controls
such as twin circular sawmills are advantageous because the operator is
removed from the carriage when it is passing through the log - thus distancing
the operator from exhaust fumes and sawdust.
Related to portable sawmills safety is the issue of sawmill training.
Only 2 of the 6 Australian sawmills manufacturers surveyed in the JVAP
research offer training. Since many sawmill contractors using portable
sawmills have no previous sawmilling experience, there is a need for vocational
training. At the moment this training is available from the Logging Industry
Training Centre in Mount Gambier and the Victorian Timber Industry Training
Centre (VTITC) in Creswick.
Many of the problems encountered by farm foresters with respect to sawlogs and other forest products may simply be pushed along the processing stream if potential products and markets are not carefully considered.
The return for sawn timber is greatly influenced by the sawmilling strategies
used, the type of logs sawn, the management of the operation, and the handling
and grading of sawn timber.
Backsawing - production of boards with faces roughly tangential to annual growth rings - is quicker than quarter sawing and permits easier handling of growth stresses. Quarter sawing - cutting boards with faces parallel to the rays - produces boards with a more decorative appearance and less cupping, warping and shrinkage that backsawn boards.
Live sawing - cutting a face, sitting the log on that face and then cutting boards from the positioned log - is possible with chainsaw mills, horizontal bandsaw mills, and bench-type circular saws.
Backsawn and quarter sawn boards are most easily done with single and twin circular sawmills, but it is possible with chainsaw mills, horizontal bandsaw mills, and bench-type circular saws with frequent log repositioning.
Split taper sawing - parallel to the central axis of the log - is the
most common longitudinal cutting strategy employed with portable sawmilling
and results in least wastage.

Options available include:
Mechanical stress and machine proof grading are more accurate and
time efficient than visual stress grading. A portable sawmiller wishing
to produce structural timber can obtain a visual stress grading ticket
from the VTITC.