| Rural Industries Research & Development Corporation |
|| Home || Search || Contact us || Deer R & D Program ||
|
The
|
Report
|
No. 62: Ecchymosis What Causes It
THE FULL REPORT
This is a summary of a published RIRDC final research report, Ecchymosis What Causes It? (Pub no. 99/48) by Dr Robert Mulley (phone 02 4570 1438, fax: 02 4570 1383, email: r.mulley@uws.edu.au) and David Falepau, University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury. See order form at back for details or visit our website to download the report at www.rirdc.gov.au/pub/cat/contents.html
their capacity to achieve a short (<5 seconds), medium (<10 seconds), or long (>10 seconds) interval between stunning and the initiation of exsanguination;
their capacity to implement various stunning and exsanguination methods.
From the results of
the current study it was concluded that ecchymosis at each of these abattoir
types could be reduced, but only if recommendations specific for each type
were adopted.
Case studies of deer slaughtered
at different abattoirs to determine the prevalence of ecchymosis were conducted.
Of 257 rusa deer slaughtered, 14.8% had ecchymosis > grade 3 in the loins.
Of 94 red deer slaughtered, only 1 had ecchymosis > grade 2 in the round.
In these studies, the
fallow deer were slaughtered by electrical stunning in facilities developed
for sheep, and the red deer and rusa deer were slaughtered by captive bolt
stunning, in facilities developed for cattle.
In abattoirs where the interval between stunning and the initiation of exsanguination was <5 seconds, thoracic stick exsanguination significantly (p<0.001) reduced the incidence of ecchymosis for both electrical stunning and captive bolt stunning. In other abattoir systems, reducing the interval between stunning and the initiation of exsanguination from 25 seconds to less than 10 seconds significantly reduced the amount of ecchymosis regardless of stunning methods (p<0.008), highlighting the importance of this factor.
The method of exsanguination was shown to be a critical factor in the development of ecchymosis. The rate of blood loss using the thoracic stick method was significantly (p<0.001) greater than the gash cut method regardless of stunning method.
There was also a significant (p<0.05) stunning by exsanguination method interaction, with electrical stunning associated with a greater rate of blood loss in thoracic stuck deer, in contrast with the captive bolt being associated with the greater rate in gash cut deer.
The thoracic stick method of exsanguination incorporated into slaughter systems where the interval between stunning and exsanguination was <5 seconds significantly (p<0.001) reduced the amount of ecchymosis even when following electrical stunning. The same effect was observed in slaughter systems where the interval between stunning and exsanguination was >5 seconds but not to the same level of significance (p<0.03).
Restricting the movement of the animal subsequent to the onset of the grand mal seizure induced by the stun was tested, and it was concluded that mechanically limiting the forward extension of a hind limb to less than its maximum potential reduced the incidence of ecchymosis in the round (M. vastus lateralis and M. rectus femoris- the two largest muscles in the round and those most likely to express ecchymosis) and a number of other muscles. It may be possible to design a restraining device that restricts muscle contraction, however it should be noted that any restraint on the animal prior to stunning may compromise its welfare.
Ecchymosis was common in the carcasses of deer killed by head only electrical stunning, a method preferred because of compatibility with the requirements of Muslim carcasses in both domestic and export markets. Ecchymosis also occurred in the carcasses of deer killed by captive bolt stunning, if the technique of exsanguination was variable. This study has shown that a number of factors contribute to the expression of ecchymosis in the carcasses of slaughtered deer, and that tailoring of slaughter procedures to suit particular slaughter systems is necessary, to reduce the extent to which ecchymosis occurs.
2. Attempts should
be made to reduce the interval between stunning and the initiation of exsanguination.
b. In slaughter systems where the interval can be reduced to less than 10 seconds, captive bolt stunning, rather than head only electrical stunning may be the preferred method.
c. Where the interval cannot be reduced to less than 10 seconds, head only electrical stunning may reduce ecchymosis in comparison with captive bolt stunning. However, when using head only electrical stunning, exsanguination must be initiated within 20 seconds of stunning, or captive bolt stunning should be used.
3. The minimum
voltage required for humane head only electrical stunning of fallow deer
is 150 volts for a current duration of 1 second.
b. The humane head only electrical stunning of deer assumes correct placement of the electrodes transversely across the dorsal surface of the neck no more than 3cm behind the base line of the ears. The probes should point cranially and must pierce the skin.
4. The commercialisation
of a fallow deer restraining device that limits the movement of the hind
limbs to less than their maximum potential after rendering the animal insensible
by stunning should be investigated.
5. Only the minimum
number of male fallow deer required to maintain a supply of animals for
slaughter throughout the breeding season should be castrated.
b. The slaughter of entire fallow deer bucks should commence as soon as possible after the peak breeding season but only when aggressive rutting behaviour has ceased.
6. Fallow
deer venison should not be exported as whole carcasses. Carcasses should
be further processed to enable the detection and condemnation of meat exhibiting
ecchymosis.
a Where this is not
possible, the left round may be inspected for the presence of ecchymosis
while attached to the carcass, via the removal of the M. tensor fasciae
latae (the small triangular muscle on the outside thigh). Where ecchymosis
is detected in the left round of a carcass by this method the carcass should
not be exported whole as usually ecchymosis will be exhibited in every
other hind leg primal and loin.
7. When deer carcasses are further processed, venison should not be inspected until after the denvering process, as superficial ecchymosis (grade 1) is often removed.
Other RIRDC deer reports: