![]() |
|
Summary of full report
A report for the RIRDC/Land & Water Australia/FWPRDC/MDBC Joint Venture Agroforestry Program
by Ian Geers and Keith Emery
October 2007
RIRDC Publication No 07/083 RIRDC Project No DIR-1A
Who is the report targeted
at?
All users of vegetation
data will benefit from this project as it will simplify their search requirements.
University students, industry groups with interests in private native forests, environmental planners, scientists and vegetation practitioners are just a few of these. The project is targeted at those individuals and groups interested in native forest operations on private lands, but it will also assist any users of vegetation data.
Background
Regional natural resource
management groups, planners and forest managers use maps and other vegetation
information to understand and manage forest resources for a range of purposes.
Such vegetation information is prepared by a range of organisations, often
with varying vegetation measures and descriptors. Metadata statements describing
these data are key to searching for available maps and data. A vegetation
metadata statement is a brief description or summary of the vegetation
data and maps that can be accessed at a particular source. This summary
information should be provided for all data sets, but is generally not
presented consistently between regions or agencies, making it hard to search.
There is a need to collate vegetation metadata into a single publication for private lands in NSW, to improve access. This has not previously been done, despite the fact that several data audits have been undertaken previously. Also, previous audits have not identified all relevant data sets because they have missed those where the categorisation or name of the data set prevents ready recognition of its individual components. For example, some data sets held by the NSW Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources are referred to as multiple attribute data sets. These may provide information on slope, terrain, land use, land degradation, vegetation, soils and site limitations features.
There has also been no previous attempt to collect all the data in a single archive and to make it available to the public via the web.
Aims/Objectives
The aims of this project
were to:
As a result of reviewing
and compiling the metadata, the project also recommended key fields to
include in metadata statements, to improve consistency and assist future
searches.
Methods used
A review of previous NSW
vegetation data audits was conducted, followed by collation of current
and previous vegetation data audits. Various key groups were then contacted,
including government agencies, local government and community groups, and
asked to supply information regarding their current NSW vegetation data
sets. All data sets were then evaluated, described and amalgamated into
a master list. Emphasis was given to the most current and useful data sets
on private land for private native forestry purposes, to assist in identifying
the location of commercial timber species. Data sets were reviewed up to
August 2005.
Results/Key findings
All relevant native vegetation
data sets over freehold lands, including some projects that are still in
the process of being completed, were identified. This list of current available
vegetation data sets on freehold land is given in Appendix 1. Fifty-five
data sets are listed, and described using 13 data fields.
The mapped regions span much of NSW, at various scales. The NSW data are available via the NSW Natural Resources Atlas website (http://www.nratlas.nsw.gov.au). More detailed data will be provided by NSW Department of Natural Resources (DNR) via the Community Access to Natural Resources Information (CANRI) website.
Various problems have been identified with metadata statements during this project. The main issues are insufficient documentation of the data set involved; not placing the metadata on the NSW Natural Resources Data Directory (NRDD) website; and multiple metadata statements for the same data set (ie. mainly because it was a joint project with two custodians or because one agency captures the data electronically from another agency and treats it as its own data set).
Metadata statements were inconsistent, sometimes unclear, and varied in the information they provided. Therefore, this project has recommended the key data that it is desirable to include in metadata statements.
Implications for relevant
stakeholders
A listing of vegetation
mapping data sets is now available through this report and the CANRI website.
A substantial number of new vegetation data sets have been identified through this project.
This will assist regional catchment management groups, and natural resource managers to utilise existing information more efficiently, and minimise duplication of mapping and survey effort.
Recommendations It is recommended that:
The following recommendations
are targeted at data custodians, funding agencies and policy makers.
Metadata statements should include the following:
Metadata (statements)
as described here are dataset descriptions that comply with ANZLIC Core
Metadata Guidelines Version 2 (February 2001).