![]() |
|
Download full report (PDF 460k - HINT: right click and save the file to your hard disk before opening)
Summary of full report
Australian dairy market deregulation:
Coping with policy changeby
David Harris, Freelance Economist
D. N. Harris & Associates, Melbourne, Australia
Paper prepared for the 25th Western Canadian Dairy Seminar
6-9 March 2006, Capri Centre, Red Deer, Alberta, Canada
Farm level adjustment mostly happened in the first two years of a deregulated market. A number of farmers left the industry some older farmers retired, some switched into alternative farm products and others found jobs outside of agriculture.
But the impact on industry output was limited as the remaining farmers adapted to the new market conditions by improving the productive performance of their dairy enterprise. In general the response was to increase farm output deregulation created growth opportunities for individuals in the fluid milk sector.
Some reacted by expanding herds and increasing land areas. But most made changes to improve the physical performance of their farms greater carrying capacity, improved pasture management and increased milk yields.
The over-night policy change made the full impact transparent. It sharpened the incentive farmers to make decisions about their future. It helped to speed up the gains in per farm performance that typically flow from policy reforms.
A phased policy change would have provided some implicit transitional assistance through the milk price. But it can dilute the incentive for major decisions to improve long term viability.
The Australian approach
realised the implicit assistance that would have been received from a phased
policy change. The experience suggests transitional assistance works better
if its a transparent, one-off, unconditional grant that allows farmers
to make decisions that suit their circumstances.
![]()
|